Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190429
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 17:42
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 230 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 486 50% 401 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1851) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 13 Parallax 6 3% 7.42 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 5.97 Splatting 4.22 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 2.5 50 106 53 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 348 Write 266 Mixed 227 SusWrite 75.9 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 7.3 26% 9.23 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 16.2 34% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 52%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 901GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 133 139 141 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 143 Write 143 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 138 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.5 189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 79%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 1,498 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 6GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 31 32 33 32 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 81.4 Write 28.9 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 31.4 48% 41.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.1 136% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 37%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 4 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.59% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 7.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 5 21% 17 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 84% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.59% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 4,116 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	68.7% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.2 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	123x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	92x
Core i3-8145UIntelBench 53%, 15,431 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	147x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	69x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	16x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	8x
WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GBWDCBench 43%, 30,897 samples	7x

RAM
AM1P24HC8T1-BBJS 1x8GBAdataBench 39%, 284 samples	48x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBHynixBench 57%, 26,973 samples	25x
M471A1K44BM0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GBSamsungBench 51%, 66 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16