Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 16:37
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 241
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 705
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 55
Parallax 44.7
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 62.2
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 367 293 293 294 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 372
Mixed 465
SusWrite 336
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 58.8
196% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
556GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 157 157 157 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 165
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 156
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
190GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 58
Write 58.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 57.5
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 51%
ASMT 2115 240GB
123GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 132 54 72 60 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 224
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 101
183% 151 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 4.1
586% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 33.5
DQ Mixed 16.9
1,784% 23.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 188%
WDC WD50 00AADS-00M2B0 500GB
374GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 38.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 39.3
49% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 33.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 30.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback