Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 94.6 1-Core 88.9 2-Core 175 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 335 44% 333 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS064GG2BNAA 64GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGSA0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 98 73 79 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 225 Write 96.2 Mixed 152 SusWrite 83.6 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 22.8 81% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 55.4 DQ Mixed 17.3 19% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.5 5.1 5.1 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Read 20 Write 8.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.7 11% 9.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.5 66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,092 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	62.3% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.4 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	107x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	101x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	65x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $626

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16