Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 15:22
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
FM1 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 48
1-Core 19.4
2-Core 46.6
26% 38 Pts
4-Core 54.2
8-Core 53.9
7% 54.1 Pts
64-Core 57.2
4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.34 fps
MRender 2.24
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 53.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 87.3
17% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 11.2
37% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 21.4
24% 38 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
122GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 56 41 65 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 86.3
Write 114
Mixed 55
SusWrite 52.9
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
205% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
475GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 55 42 65 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 93.7
Write 95.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 53.2
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $369
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback