Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 89 2-Core 140 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 411 42% 338 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB CLim: 789 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Lighting 7.93 Reflection 6.19 Parallax 7.03 6% 7.05 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 9.03 Splatting 0.09 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: JE3AD70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 43 48 51 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 54.2 Write 32.2 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 35.2 30% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.5 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	18x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	18x

SSD
Ultra 3D 1TBSanDisk $67Bench 98%, 5,838 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
M5M mSATA 64GBPlextor $94Bench 64%, 128 samples	2x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	8x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 1,072 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $487

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16