Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 09:43
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 808
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 37.2
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 36.3
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 262 262 252 245 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 281
Mixed 265
SusWrite 257
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 35.9
148% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 236
204% 303 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
272GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 122 123 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 121
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
813GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 177 175 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 166
Mixed 102
SusWrite 176
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
0GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 11 11 11 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 10.3
10% 8.57 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 12%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
118GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 30.8
Write 35.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 38.1
44% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.4
173% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 29.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback