Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 08:32
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 149
55% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 616
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 2,677
166% 2,677 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 146
Parallax 95.4
108% 125 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 138
Splatting 96.7
103% 131 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 105%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,883
Write 1,349
Mixed 839
299% 1,357 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 42.6
138% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 429
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 387
283% 373 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
101GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 314 316 316 315 309 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 437
Mixed 421
SusWrite 335
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 40.9
136% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 338
255% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 129%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
639GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 112
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
690GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 114
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
97GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 90.8
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 85.6
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
230GB free
Firmware: A3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 67 68 69 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 90.2
Write 74
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 63.6
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 15.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $643
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback