Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory50.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 07:44
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53% Above average
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 148
52% 110 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 587
54% 441 Pts
64-Core 2,590
174% 2,590 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,100
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 387
Reflection 375
Parallax 287
96% 350 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 398
Splatting 214
102% 313 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 183%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,011
Write 1,380
Mixed 808
308% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 43.5
142% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 398
291% 382 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 353%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
101GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 313 316 319 318 315 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 474
Mixed 460
SusWrite 338
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 44.5
146% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 130%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
639GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 111 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 102
SusWrite 112
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 102%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$70
690GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 114
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$60
97GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 93 93 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 94.4
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 92.9
69% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$90
230GB free
Firmware: A3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 94.7
Write 80.5
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 71.3
52% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.5
10% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
61.7% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 22.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 16.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $500SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback