Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 06:54
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 150 70% 113 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 228 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 38.8 37% 38.7 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 37 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 124 127 128 128 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 387 Write 360 Mixed 271 SusWrite 154 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 37.4 126% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 54 49% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 110%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 124 126 126 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 127 Write 100 Mixed 87.7 SusWrite 124 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 2x8GB 4,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 19.7 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	288x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	141x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	33x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	29x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	27x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16