Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 18.6 2-Core 39.2 29% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 68 8-Core 101 10% 84.3 Pts	64-Core 101 6% 101 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M 4,170 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 04B7) 3GB CLim: 590 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	5.06% Terrible	Lighting 5.63 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 4.81 5% 5.67 fps	MRender 7.81 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 8.13 6% 7.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.06% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt109x- Volume 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0918B SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 277 311 307 319 325 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	Read 314 Write 337 Mixed 309 SusWrite 310 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 13.7 50% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 52.9 DQ Write 52.1 DQ Mixed 69.9 48% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB 885 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.4 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	242x
GeForce GT 555MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,170 samples	236x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	67x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	38x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	23x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16