Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 216 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 211 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.25 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.3 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.3 17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM871 2.5 7mm 256GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMM02D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 225 213 205 190 185 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 484 Write 421 Mixed 325 SusWrite 208 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 40.3 134% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 311 239% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 118%
USB Flash Disk 32GB 2,373 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 23GB free, PID null, Metal U-disk 32 Gb 3.0 (Wish) SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 23 22 25 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 112 Write 19 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 23.1 40% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB 963 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 36 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 21 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	385x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	348x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16