Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	6.58% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110331
Uptime	43 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '19 at 11:19
Run Duration	506 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 154 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 297 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 0.04 Parallax 0 3% 1.41 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z331 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.58% Terrible	Read 28 Write 86.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 0.2 7% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 204GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 118 115 118 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 107 Write 113 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 114 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 108%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$33 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 316GB free Firmware: SN04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 46 42 49 45 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 148 Write 157 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 53.2 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 13.8 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $196Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	128x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	77x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	59x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	36x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	164x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	97x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $224

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16