Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 10:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,009
96% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
EVGA(3842 6335) 2GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 18.9
17% 18.6 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 21.3
16% 19 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 402 403 405 404 405 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 1809
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 560
353% 1,589 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 94
312% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1,168
868% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 283%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
91GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 294 294 298 269 240 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 478
Mixed 426
SusWrite 292
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 63.3
213% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 286
215% 287 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
652GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 96 100 96 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 96.7
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.1% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 25.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback