Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 678
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6793
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.27
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 7.75
5% 8.31 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 15.2
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 38
Parallax 30.9
27% 33.9 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 42.8
34% 40.7 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1652 749 590 589 592 593 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2013
Write 1,757
Mixed 1,231
SusWrite 794
324% 1,449 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66.7
226% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 1,105
785% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 241%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback