Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 12:31
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
75% Very good
1-Core 115
2-Core 217
79% 166 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 759
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 966
65% 966 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 75%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$270
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 235
Reflection 205
Parallax 217
62% 219 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 217
Splatting 164
59% 177 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 102 93 107 121 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 474
Mixed 302
SusWrite 137
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 49
172% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 178
186% 306 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$65
650GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 109
Mixed 106
SusWrite 117
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
873GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 91 93 93 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 91
Write 90.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 89.8
56% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSTK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 17.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 100%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 7,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $412
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback