Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 23:30
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 112
53% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 291
31% 249 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
XFX(1682 3002) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 136 157 151 160 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 360
Write 210
Mixed 209
SusWrite 149
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 153
124% 172 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
650GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 99 106 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 102
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 202 201 203 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 164
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 201
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
789GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 85 85 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 85.9
Write 83.1
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 83.5
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 57%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
557GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 92
Write 27.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 28
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback