Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 22:54
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-8300-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.8% Average
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 118
44% 92 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 398
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 380
26% 380 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
XFX(1682 3002) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 7.6
0% 7.4 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 8.1
4% 10.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 143 127 137 123 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 309
Write 201
Mixed 201
SusWrite 136
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 29.8
95% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 164
126% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$124
650GB free
Firmware: CC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 76
SusWrite 104
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 205 203 204 205 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 152
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 203
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 118%
Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$99
789GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 85 85 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.8
Write 83.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 83.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
557GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 86.7
Write 27
Mixed 31
SusWrite 28.5
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 12,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $208

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $762
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $338Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback