Packard DOTS E2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive10.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemPackard DOTS E2  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJE02_PT_E
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 14:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
1-Core 5.8
2-Core 12.5
4% 9.15 Pts
4-Core 25.2
8-Core 25.2
4% 25.2 Pts
64-Core 27.6
2% 27.6 Pts
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 43 52 51 49 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.7% Very poor
Read 109
Write 26.7
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 47.2
13% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.7
11% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 355
11% 355 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 26%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $190
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback