Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 204
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 406
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 3000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.63
Reflection 7.65
Parallax 4.53
4% 5.61 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 3.67
Splatting 15.6
8% 8.71 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.3% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 60.1
37% 56.9 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 61.7
38% 44 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 838 830 750 779 716 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 996
Write 931
Mixed 866
SusWrite 787
202% 895 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 31.4
125% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 598
452% 605 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 153%
Great: 435%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
474GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 800 819 753 586 589 594 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 1,011
Mixed 810
SusWrite 690
203% 905 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 53.7
168% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 668
493% 649 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 168%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback