PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019) (all builds) |
Motherboard | Razer DA720 |
Memory | 56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190516 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '19 at 10:47 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 3000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
|
5.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 838 830 750 779 716 MB/s
|
153%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
474GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 800 819 753 586 589 594 MB/s
|
168%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 74x |
RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples | 44x |
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |