Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 07:45
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$349
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.4% Below average
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 77.7
35% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 219
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 226
15% 226 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 107
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 99.3
28% 92.9 fps
MRender 78.3
Gravity 110
Splatting 79.8
30% 89.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 142 137 95 49 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 357
Write 294
Mixed 281
SusWrite 113
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 20
74% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 27.5
47% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100
732GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 259 254 278 292 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 330
Write 299
Mixed 306
SusWrite 262
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 24.8
79% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 187
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$148
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 151 151 154 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 113
Write 125
Mixed 111
SusWrite 151
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
306% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76%
Great: 91%
USB 3.0 256GB
209GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
Read 36
Write 32.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 17.7
22% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 5.5
955% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 18%
USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 29.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 17.8
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
65% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 104%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 128
Write 41.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 14.5
54% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.5
124% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
14GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 121
Write 39.5
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 13.5
56% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
109% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 32%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
329GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 17.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 19.2
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 23%
ST332082 0A 320GB
250GB free, PID 0275
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 17.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 18.5
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 18%
HGST_HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
730GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 130 132 133 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 137
Write 118
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 132
138% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G CT102464BA160B.M16 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $229Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $46
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $339Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback