Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 04:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 248
90% 158 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 821
78% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.1
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 67.2
60% 72.9 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 73.3
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,393
Write 1,246
Mixed 1,226
356% 1,622 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 81.5
282% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 1,171
DQ Mixed 1,008
778% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
94GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 154 125 117 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 460
Write 260
Mixed 297
SusWrite 164
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 19.3
74% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 41.7
48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
19GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 114 126 134 145 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 128
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 25.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 28.3
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback