Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181224
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '19 at 02:12
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 65.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 210 69% 126 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 649 65% 527 Pts	64-Core 1,012 63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.6% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 59.8 58% 67 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 65.7 Splatting 67 54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 187GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 436 446 448 461 351 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 446 Mixed 433 SusWrite 397 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 48.4 163% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 292 220% 293 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 62 82 92 94 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 114 Write 148 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 84.2 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 42,084 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	63.1% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 23.3 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 18.5 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	2,658x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,461x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,022x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	764x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	556x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	545x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	282x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	227x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	225x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	631x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	557x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	439x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16