PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 890GM Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100623 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '19 at 00:47 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | VEN-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 38 23 32 13 17 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905403-02X.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 400 MHz
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 2x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
Phenom II X6 1075TAMD $254Bench 56%, 4,420 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 3x |
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 1x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $83 |