PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | ECS A68M-C4DL (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150630 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 07 '19 at 17:15 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1313 MHz, MLim: 1591 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
155GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 44 65 65 67 67 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 119 122 129 125 MB/s
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 3x |
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples | 2x |
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 1x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |