Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.71% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 16:24
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8320-$163
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 122
56% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 398
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 404
27% 404 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Asus(1043 04A9) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 27
Parallax 24.8
17% 24.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 29.8
15% 24.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 24%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 94 14 28 34 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.71% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 83.5
Mixed 15
SusWrite 48.8
9% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 3.8
17% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 18.4
15% 21.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$153
1TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 87.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 59
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 57%
Mb2000gc WLT 2TB
759GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 134
Write 40.3
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 41
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$134
328GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 72
SusWrite 96.3
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
576GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 97 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 98.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 99.5
125% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $443
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $175
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback