Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 22:03
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 910 84% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,366 84% 1,366 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 922 924 921 920 924 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,454 Write 934 Mixed 900 SusWrite 920 235% 1,052 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 69.6 240% 82.9 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 220 271% 460 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 242%
TSA 240G B 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 206GB free Firmware: 0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 441 442 440 442 445 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.1% Very good	Read 472 Write 419 Mixed 370 SusWrite 442 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 22.5 93% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 43 52% 91.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 79%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 439GB free Firmware: JA0OA710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 85 84 86 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 81 Write 79.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 84.9 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 550GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 134 133 133 133 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 163 Write 138 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 132 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4C3000C15 2x8GB 803 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 31.9 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 27.8 91% 31.8 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16