Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 650 65% 528 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3967) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 35.7 31% 38.1 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 33.3 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 164 Write 58.7 Mixed 9.2 17% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 71%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$33 2,425 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 70GB free Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 117 170 412 527 520 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,188 Write 68.3 Mixed 250 SusWrite 321 99% 457 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 30.8 168% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 408 DQ Write 37.7 DQ Mixed 253 177% 233 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 179%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 184GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 142 144 141 140 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 38 SusWrite 141 72% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 244GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 57 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39% Below average	Read 77.2 Write 82 Mixed 48 SusWrite 58.2 49% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 26.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.8 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	395x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	133x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	87x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $578

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16