Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.3% Good
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 196
69% 146 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 624
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 982
66% 982 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 115
Reflection 105
Parallax 114
30% 111 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 110
Splatting 76.7
28% 86.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$95
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 164
Write 58.7
Mixed 9.2
17% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 72%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$34
70GB free
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 117 170 412 527 520 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 68.3
Mixed 250
SusWrite 321
99% 457 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 30.8
168% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 253
177% 233 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 126%
Great: 172%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$13
184GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 142 144 141 140 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 108
Write 112
Mixed 38
SusWrite 141
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$65
244GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 57 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 82
Mixed 48
SusWrite 58.2
49% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$107
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 26.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 100%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback