Asus CM6850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CM6850 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CM6850
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111221
Uptime	12.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 187 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 411 47% 368 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 29.9 Parallax 36.7 31% 34.9 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 35.3 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 396 Write 420 Mixed 317 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 33.4 123% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 252 208% 296 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 474GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 128 128 129 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 127 Write 117 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 126 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: 9122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 12.6 17% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 113%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 4TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 162 164 165 167 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 158 Write 152 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 159 179% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.2 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 89%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 147GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 22.2 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 11.6 26% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 43%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 2,863 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 3GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 19 Write 14.5 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 10 19% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3 207% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 64C0MHHHJ-HS SLA302G08-GGNHC 64C0MHHHJ-HS 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	97x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	10x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	11x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	9x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	8x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	11x
SLZ302G08-MDJHB 4x2GBUnknownBench 45%, 226 samples	7x
SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC SLA302G08-GGNHC RMB4GB684CA3-16IC 16GBUnknownBench 44%, 5 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $228

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16