Asus K53SC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus K53SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SC
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '19 at 03:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 95.3
46% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 49.6
14% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.05 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 104 32 56 9 7 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 187
Write 120
Mixed 69
SusWrite 47.1
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 6.9
25% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 48.9
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 26.6
30% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 56%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
14GB free, PID 1408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 4 5.6 5.2 5.1 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 8.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 4.9
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
51% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 21%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 1TB
593GB free, PID ab2e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 72 100 94 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44% Average
Read 67.1
Write 99.2
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 82.4
99% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.4
195% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SC Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $89
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback