Asus H97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '19 at 03:08
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 107 2-Core 209 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 485 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1510 MHz, MLim: 1970 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.6% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 88.7 52% 73.9 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 57.1 52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB 18,578 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 704 599 470 361 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 1,002 Write 827 Mixed 428 SusWrite 532 155% 697 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 40.8 143% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 439 DQ Write 421 DQ Mixed 260 242% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 332%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L2 256GB 2,145 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 65GB free Firmware: EXT06L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 230 244 254 142 88 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 475 Write 258 Mixed 216 SusWrite 203 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 33.1 146% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 78.5 123% 237 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.1 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 944 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO GAMER - $193

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	220x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	213x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	59x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	31x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16