Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 146% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190718
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '19 at 22:57
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 88.3 1-Core 155 2-Core 308 99% 184 Pts	4-Core 606 8-Core 1,137 104% 871 Pts	64-Core 2,178 135% 2,178 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 200 Parallax 181 146% 187 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 175 Splatting 122 114% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR120GB 120GB 308 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0816C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 40 30 61 33 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 513 Write 432 Mixed 420 SusWrite 91.5 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 8.3 69% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 0.4 73% 172 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 86%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB 837 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 140GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.1% Very poor	Read 41.7 Write 38.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 38.3 9% 39 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 12.1 45% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 27.2 DQ Mixed 29.2 22% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 77%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 213GB free Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1278 866 867 867 868 869 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,020 Write 2252 Mixed 1,726 SusWrite 936 390% 1,733 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 215 4K Mixed 80.6 295% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,010 DQ Write 863 DQ Mixed 943 705% 939 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 297%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 203GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 146 146 146 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 113 Write 113 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 146 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 27,641 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 47.4 MC Write 43.6 MC Mixed 42.5 127% 44.5 GB/s	SC Read 26 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 35.5 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	217x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $190Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $760

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)