Lenovo 2325VAD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2325VAD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325VAD
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '19 at 18:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 153
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 236
30% 230 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2BW160G3D 160GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 149 146 150 147 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 92.8
Write 150
Mixed 151
SusWrite 148
31% 135 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 13.9
47% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 65.2
58% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 49%
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
15GB free
Firmware: EXT48D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 73 65 66 65 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 169
Write 76.6
Mixed 119
SusWrite 69.5
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 17.5
59% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 60.7
66% 114 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 99P5471-002.AOOLF M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback