Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 350V5(C\|X) 350V4(C\|X) 351V5(C\|X) 351V4(C\|X) 3540V(C\|X) (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP350V5C-S0DTR
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '19 at 14:26
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 87.6 1-Core 77 2-Core 119 60% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 176 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D8) 778MB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 2.69 3% 2.63 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.51 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Longline 120GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 173 58 51 57 54 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	45% Average	Read 320 Write 242 Mixed 271 SusWrite 89.2 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 14.5 60% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 1 56% 131 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 73%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 89GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 21 25 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 15.2 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 21.7 27% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GB 2,515 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 10 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 350V5C/350V5X/350V4C/350V4X/351V5C/351V5X/351V4C/351V4X/3540VC/3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 350V5(C|X) 350V4(C|X) 351V5(C|X) 351V4(C|X) 3540V(C|X)

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	118x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	69x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	51x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	314x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	8x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	39x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	27x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16