Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 20:57
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 706
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3160
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 56.7
51% 62.8 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 61.4
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1080 293 291 292 292 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,770
Write 1317
Mixed 914
SusWrite 424
246% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 65.8
219% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 871
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 791
598% 803 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 201%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 119 123 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 74
Write 116
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 122
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 26.3
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback