Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory30.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.2% Good
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 187
68% 143 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 693
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 896
60% 896 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 33.9
7% 29 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 29.4
8% 25.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 397 398 400 399 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,900
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 574
333% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 56.9
203% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 717
537% 716 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 212%
Great: 288%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$55
695GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 137 136 134 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 112
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 115%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$19
98GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 75.1
Write 75.8
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 75.9
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 63%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 14 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 15.1
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 14.8
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
109% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 33.7
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback