Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory30.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 182
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 663
60% 503 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.6
7% 9.9 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 12.8
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 397 398 400 399 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,900
Mixed 1,442
SusWrite 574
333% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 56.9
203% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 717
537% 716 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 212%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
695GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 137 136 134 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 138
Write 112
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
98GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 75.1
Write 75.8
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 75.9
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 15 14 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 15.1
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 14.8
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
109% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 33.7
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback