Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160713
Uptime13.7 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 11:05
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 172
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 722
62% 530 Pts
64-Core 2,067
128% 2,067 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,484
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 139
Parallax 237
79% 158 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 226
Splatting 152
165% 209 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 107%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 667 648 635 610 559 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 1,159
Mixed 708
SusWrite 640
225% 1,012 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 39.3
129% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 339
252% 337 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 156%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
43GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 196 183 175 167 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 444
Write 414
Mixed 372
SusWrite 197
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 34.4
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 324
251% 344 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
303GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 157 156 156 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 117
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 155
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965604-001.D00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 42.9
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $649
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback