Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4150 Quad-Core 138 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 127 60% 96.4 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 223 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Gigabyte(1458 3536) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1025 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	7.85% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 2.09 6% 6.71 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 14.4 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.85% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 98 99 111 105 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 245GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 93 93 92 94 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 90 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 93.7 60% 81.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-050.A00LF 1x4GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.8 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 0.4 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16