Lenovo 9481B8Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 9481B8Q  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 06:13
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
21.7% Poor
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 79.1
30% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 82.5
8-Core 80.9
11% 81.7 Pts
64-Core 99.2
7% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 27%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$30
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 10 11 12 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 5.8
Write 11.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 12.1
7% 9.77 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 57%
Sony Hard Drive 1TB
127GB free, PID 0b7e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 22
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 24.3
27% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback