Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 01:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$360
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
92% 196 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 793
82% 647 Pts
64-Core 915
61% 915 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$415
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 295
Reflection 277
Parallax 284
78% 285 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 271
Splatting 220
74% 225 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$58
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 423 452 452 456 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 311
Mixed 428
SusWrite 441
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 51.1
172% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 183
157% 224 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 111%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
178GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 163
Write 156
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 112
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 142 142 142 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 137
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 141
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 8,933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $944
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback