Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5E-A01US
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-3227U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
27.5% Poor
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 89.9
34% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 133
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 130
9% 130 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.9
3% 11.4 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 17.4
2% 10.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$53
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 107 108 104 87 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 366
SusWrite 141
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 30.6
107% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 135
100% 132 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 1.6 4.4 4.8 4.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 13%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 23.3
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback