Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5E-A01US
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3227U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 89.5
46% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 130
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.99 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 107 108 104 87 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 366
SusWrite 141
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 30.6
107% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 96.3
DQ Mixed 135
100% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
3GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 1.6 4.4 4.8 4.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 13%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 23.3
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback