| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Compaq 8510p (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30C5 |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070725 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 01 '19 at 06:37 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.7%
Below average
|
33% 45.8 Pts
|
6% 45 Pts
|
3% 45.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
HP(103C 30C5) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
|
1.79%
Terrible
|
2% 2.24 fps
|
2% 2.67 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBCOC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 21 15 31 23 34 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
20% 26.7 MB/s
|
80% 0.43 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6
9GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8 8.1 8.4 9.2 8.4 MB/s
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
16% 14.5 MB/s
|
188% 3.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
12% 4.27 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8510p Builds (Compare 14 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8510p
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $90 |