Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '19 at 20:47
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 180 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 698 61% 519 Pts	64-Core 891 55% 891 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 8.07 Reflection 9.38 Parallax 9.66 7% 9.04 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 7.07 Splatting 11.6 8% 9.81 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 396 398 399 398 400 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	211% Outstanding	Read 2,054 Write 1,903 Mixed 1,414 SusWrite 574 332% 1,486 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 55.4 202% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 764 DQ Write 666 DQ Mixed 715 536% 715 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 211% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 802GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 135 136 135 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 167 Write 138 Mixed 74 SusWrite 134 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 98GB free Firmware: AX001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 74.8 Write 76.8 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 76.1 47% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 36.6 MC Mixed 33.6 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16