Gateway GT4228m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemGateway GT4228m  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway RS780
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080505
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 18:54
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core
AM2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
1-Core 29
2-Core 43.2
18% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 70.9
8-Core 88.6
11% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 73.3
5% 73.3 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 014E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 1.2
0% 1.97 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2.5
0% 1.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 0%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$25
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 64 62 64 61 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 129
Write 96.3
Mixed 153
SusWrite 56.9
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 14.8
50% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 58.4
DQ Mixed 27.8
26% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
19GB free
Firmware: AM001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 42 43 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 46
Write 48.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 41.6
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 63%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$45
116GB free
Firmware: AX002M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 65 62 65 62 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 59.3
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 57.6
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$20
79GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 65 66 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 83.8
Write 70.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 60.9
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$30
165GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 43 41 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 56
Mixed 35
SusWrite 41.2
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.5
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 475
8% 475 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GT4228m Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Gateway GT4228m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback