Positivo DH8BT11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemPositivo DH8BT11  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo DH8BT11
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N2808
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
1-Core 27
2-Core 53.7
19% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 53.8
8-Core 54.1
7% 53.9 Pts
64-Core 53.6
4% 53.6 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 93 93 79 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 52.6
Write 86.4
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 83.8
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 62%
11GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 5.4 5.5 5.4 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.03 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Teikon TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 0.2
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 23%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical DH8BT11 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Positivo DH8BT11

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback