PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 10 GB free of 14.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100406 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '19 at 20:39 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 45% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3503-$32
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 161 220 228 177 205 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 534x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 488x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 272x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 155x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |