Asrock J4105B-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock J4105B-ITX (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 47.8 1-Core 52.2 2-Core 105 40% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 209 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% MSI(1462 303A) 2GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.3 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 30.4 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 31.7 25% 30.3 fps	MRender 30 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 39.7 29% 34.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 146 162 267 152 231 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.2% Above average	Read 127 Write 84.2 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 204 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 32.6 92% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 162 147% 218 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 885GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 196 201 199 198 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 188 Mixed 84 SusWrite 198 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%
Seagate Portable 250GB 728 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 208GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 38 Write 40.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 41.7 51% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GB 172 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 14.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105B-ITX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4105B-ITX

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	1x
128GB 128GBIntensoBench 66%, 1,805 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 69%, 62 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $55

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16