Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory244.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 17:16
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 150
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 661
59% 500 Pts
64-Core 2,599
161% 2,599 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB; N511207000F4001 Manli GeForce RTX 2070 8GB GDDR6 Twin
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 123
Parallax 136
104% 129 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 122
Splatting 102
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 74 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 693
Write 87.2
Mixed 148
SusWrite 74.8
54% 251 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.8
65% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 283%
Samsung MZ7KM480HAHP-0E005 480GB
219GB free
Firmware: 003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 316 309 297 294 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 406
Mixed 388
SusWrite 307
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 41.5
137% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 126%
Adaptec Array 960GB
489GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 615 600 570 573 580 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 94%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
325GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 101 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 112
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 100
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 69 68 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 105
SusWrite 69.2
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 96%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
48GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 84 83 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 81
SusWrite 84.5
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 88%
Adaptec Array 4TB
46GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 190 183 175 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 113%
Adaptec Array 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 237 238 238 228 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 49% Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
547GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 76 78 77 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 136
Write 116
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 79
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
240GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 93 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 112
Write 98.5
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 93.1
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
593GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 147 145 141 138 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 146
Mixed 124
SusWrite 144
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GL7MMR4N-TF 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
116% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 42.4
133% 46.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 19
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback