Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 58.8 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 173 61% 110 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 735 68% 567 Pts	64-Core 1,474 91% 1,474 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 32.1 22% 27.7 fps	MRender 35.8 Gravity 30.2 Splatting 22.3 23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB 6,630 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT02L5Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 174 177 164 173 154 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36% Below average	Read 198 Write 203 Mixed 99.7 SusWrite 173 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 12.5 50% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 24.7 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 22.4 26% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 80%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 838GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 69 63 61 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 55.9 Write 52.5 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 64.1 38% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 2.4 3 3.2 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Read 13.9 Write 8.4 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 2.9 9% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GB 598 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 47 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 31.2 101% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	66x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v21stBench 73%, 400 samples	48x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	47x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	79x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	38x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	26x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	36x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	28x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	28x

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $109

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16