AMD Sharkstooth

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAMD Sharkstooth  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD WhiteHavenOC-CP
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 15:52
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: 2D2832E6UIVG5_42/36_N
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.8% Excellent
Memory 69.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,166
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 5,714
354% 5,714 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 26.20.178.8592
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 90.5
Parallax 177
79% 122 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 123
Splatting 128
95% 113 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 98 102 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 99.5
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G3A1 18ASF2G72AZ-2G3B1 32GB
1200, 1200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 31.8
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 28.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback