Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3620 x 2036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170807
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 19:42
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-7900X-$970
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
78.9% Very good
1-Core 120
2-Core 244
86% 182 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 804
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,580
106% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 411
Reflection 449
Parallax 597
108% 486 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 532
Splatting 276
137% 354 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 135%
Great: 146%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$400
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 1180 1164 608 603 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1632
Write 1,568
Mixed 737
SusWrite 897
270% 1,208 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 61.8
205% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 867
670% 916 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 226%
Great: 297%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
1TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 165 165 170 168 169 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 159
Mixed 76
SusWrite 168
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 121%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
403GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 178 168 174 172 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 166
Mixed 77
SusWrite 174
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 121%
Lexar JumpDrive S73 USB 3.0 16GB-$18
1GB free, PID a205
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 43
Write 20.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 20.6
34% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 13.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 9.4
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $2,417
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback